IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.16881 OF 2017 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
P SUBRAMANYAM S/O PACHIAPPAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NO.11/3, 10TH CROSS K P AGRAHARA BANGALORE-560023. … PETITIONER (By MR.NARENDRA GOWDA, ADV.) AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONSER B B M P BANGALORE – 560056.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER B B M P BANGALORE(SOUTH) 9TH MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS 2ND BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560041.
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER B B M P VIJAYANAGARA DIVISION 3RD MAIN ROAD VIJAYA BHAVANA VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560040. … RESPONDENTS (By MR. K N PUTTEGOWDA, ADV. FOR R-1 TO 3) - - -
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD 1.6.2015 AND 20.07.2016 VIDE ANNX-F & H, AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.Narendra Gowda, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.K.N.Puttegowda, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. The petition is admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 1.6.2015 and 20.07.2016 vide Annexures-F and H.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation with regard to his grievance to the competent authority.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation with regard to his grievance to the competent authority. Needless to state that if such a representation is submitted, the competent authority shall consider the same by a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE RV