Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

P Srinivasa Aithal vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|07 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.35889/2013 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN:
P. SRINIVASA AITHAL S/O VENKATAGIRI AITHAL AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS NO 2-44, GIRISHREE PARAMPALLI VILLAGE AND POST SALIGRAMA, UDUPI TALUK 576 225 (BY SRI. RAMESH CHANDRA, ADV.) AND ... PETITIONER 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001.
2. SRI VISHNUMURTHY TEMPLE PARAMPALLI UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 225 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX B BLOCK, FIRST FLOOR RAJATHADRI MANIPAL UDUPI DISTRICT 574 154 4. COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS MALE MAHADESWARA VARTHA BHAVAN ALUR VENKATA RAO ROAD CHAMARAJAPETE BANGALORE 560018 5. SRI JAGADISH UPADYA S/O P KRISHNA DEVA UPADYA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS KIRTHISH NO 3/144-D NEAR VISHNUMURTHY TEMPLE PARMPALLI VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK 576 225.
6. STATE DHARMIKA PARISHAT HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT, 2ND FLOOR SRI. MALE MAHADESHWARA VARTHA BHAVAN, A.V.ROAD CHAMARAJ PET, BANGALORE-560018.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA. FOR R1 TO R3 AND R4 SRI. H.S. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R2 AND R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2012 OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MANAGING COMMITTEE AS PER ANNEXURE-A AS ULTRA VIRUS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VOID, CONSEQUENTLY QUASH ANNEXURE-E1 DATED 6.7.2013.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The petitioner is challenging the order dated 29.11.2012, constituting the Managing Committee members vide Annexure-A, for a period of three years.
Since the period of three years is over, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE DM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P Srinivasa Aithal vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad