Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P S Shanmugasundaram vs The Commissioner And Others

Madras High Court|05 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
05.10.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gsk To
1. The Commissioner, H.R & C.E Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.
2. The Secretary, The Tamil Nadu Temples Trustees Administration Board, Commissioner for H.R. & C.E.
Nungambakkam, Chennai 34.
3. The Joint Commissioner for H.R & C.E.
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
gsk W.P.No.11918 of 2006 05.10.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P S Shanmugasundaram vs The Commissioner And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 October, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban