Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P. Pandiyaraj vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court|29 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent developments nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.06.2017 jer To
1.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration & Water Works Department, Fort St.Goerge, Chennai-9.
2.The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Ripon buildings Chennai-3.
W.P.No. 37902 of 2003
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P. Pandiyaraj vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2017