Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P. Mani vs 4 Maharani

Madras High Court|18 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for parties, it transpires, while the petitioner states that respondent No.4 has blocked the public pathway, the stand of respondent No.4 is that it is their personal property. Respondent No.4 has already filed a suit, but the revenue authorities are not parties to it.
2. We direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to cause an inspection to be made at site to determine the allegation of the petitioner whether there is any encroachment on the public path or not within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and in case of any encroachment is found, action in accordance with law be taken and concluded within a maximum period of two months thereafter, after notice to all concerned.
3. Since the suit proceedings pertain to the claim of the private land of respondent No.4, that pendency would not affect the present exercise being directed by this Court.
4. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs.
(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S., J.) 18.01.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bbr To 1 The District Collector, Collectorate, Tiruppur District.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P. Mani vs 4 Maharani

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 January, 2017