Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

P Hussaini vs The Government Of A P

High Court Of Telangana|04 September, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.25917 of 2014 Between:
P. Hussaini, S/o. Thirupalu, Hindu, Aged about 31 years, Bhanumukkala Village & Post, Baqnaganapalle Mandal, Kurnool District.
.. Petitioner AND The Government of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department (Stamps & Registration), A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad & 4 others .. Respondents The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.25917 of 2014 ORDER:
The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of house site, admeasuring 100 square yards, in Survey No.81/1A1, situated in 16th W a r d , Bhanumukkala Village, Banaganapalle Mandal, Kurnool District. Due to personal needs, petitioner intend to dispose of the said property. He submitted an application on 27.08.2014 to the Sub-Registrar, Banaganapalle Village and Mandal, Kurnool District (5th respondent) for the purpose of Market Value Certificate. The 5th respondent instead of issuing Market Value Certificate, issued proceedings, dated 27.08.2014, stating that the property covered by Survey No.81/1A1 of Bhanumukkala Village is prohibited property. Aggrieved thereby, this writ petition is instituted.
2. The petitioner placed reliance on the decision of this Court in W.P.No.17917 of 2013 concerning the same survey number. This Court disposed of the Writ Petition after hearing the learned Government Pleader, who submitted instructions furnished by the Tahsildar, Banaganapalle Nagar Panchayat and Mandal, Kurnool District (4th respondent). It is represented on behalf of the Government that the land is noted as poramboke (gramakantam) in the Re-survey and Settlement Register (RSR) of Bhanumukkala Village and, therefore, cannot be registered. The said objection was over ruled in the above judgment. This Court held as under:
“that mere communication that the subject land is a gramakantam as per the revenue record has no real consequence. In the event there is a little dispute with regard to such land, the Government would necessarily have to assert and establish its title before the competent forum in accordance with law. It cannot unilaterally prohibit registration of documents in respect of such land basing on such revenue entries”.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader agrees that the subject matter of this writ petition is similar to the earlier decision of this Court in W.P.No.17917 of 2013.
4. For the reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Banaganapalle Nagar Panchayat and Mandal, Kurnool District (5th respondent) to receive and process the document presented by the petitioners in respect of the house property bearing Door Nos.18/107, 18/108 and 18/109, existing in an extent of 484 square yards, in Survey No.81/1A1, situated at Bhanumukkala Village, Banaganapalle Nagar Panchayat and Mandal, Kurnool District, without reference to the entries in the revenue records. In the event the document presented is found to fulfill the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, the 5th respondent shall complete the registration formalities and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 4th September, 2014 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.25917 of 2014 Date: 4th September, 2014 KL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P Hussaini vs The Government Of A P

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
04 September, 2014
Judges
  • P Naveen Rao