Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P Elumalai vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|05 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
05.10.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gsk To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Special Cell for Land Grabbing, Villupuram & Dist.
2. The Inspector of Police, Mayilam Police Station, Tindivanam Tk, Villupuram Dist.
W.P.No.3797 of 2012
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P Elumalai vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 October, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban