No representation on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 3 and 4 is present. Even in the last two hearings, namely on 12.01.2017 and on 19.01.2017 there
M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
vs was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Due to continuous absence on the side of the petitioner, the case was directed to be listed today (23.01.2017) under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, when the case is listed under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2.Therefore, it is made clear that the petitioner is not interested to proceed the case. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
23.01.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1868 of 2012 and
M.P.No.1 of 2012
http://www.judis.nic.in