Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

P Chinaratham vs The Govt Of A P

High Court Of Telangana|20 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13512 of 2013 Between: P.Chinaratham, S/o Veerabadrarao Dated:20.11.2014 ….Petitioner And:
The Govt of A.P., reptd by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-Operation (Marketing.II) Department, Hyderabad and three others.
… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Penumaka Venkata Rao Counsel for the Respondents: A.G.P. for Agriculture (Andhra Pradesh) The court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice, vide No.A1/28/2012, dated 08.11.2012, of respondent No.2 in directing the petitioner to vacate Stall in Rythu Bazar, Swaraj maidan, Vijayawada, within 10 days, by cancelling the petitioner’s allotment, without following due process of law and affording reasonable opportunity, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to set aside notice, vide No.A1/28/2012, dated 08.11.2012.”
At the hearing, it is not disputed by learned counsel for both the parties that the issue similar to that raised in this Writ Petition, viz., extension of allotment period of stall in Rythu Bazaar beyond three years, was decided by this Court, vide Writ Petition No.33549 of 2014, dated 10.11.2014.
For the same reasons as contained in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is dismissed with the direction that the reasons contained therein shall form part of this order. However, this order will not preclude the Joint Collectors in the State to consider Letter No.RBZ/934/2013, dated 29.11.2013, of the Chief Executive Officer, Rythu Bazaars, Hyderabad and extend the term of the petitioner at his discretion. For a period of two weeks, the petitioner shall not be evicted from the stall allotted to him to enable him to make representation to the competent authority.
As a sequel, interim order, dated 19.11.2013, is vacated and WPMP.No.16461 of 2013 is dismissed as infructuous.
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
20th November, 2014 DR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P Chinaratham vs The Govt Of A P

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
20 November, 2014
Judges
  • C V Nagarjuna Reddy
Advocates
  • Sri Penumaka Venkata Rao