THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.899 of 2017
1. M/s.Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by its Branch Manager, Ranipet. ... 2nd Respondent/1st Appellant
2. M/s.Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Bangalore. ... 4th Respondent/2nd Appellant versus
1. Munisamy
2. Rajammal
3. Minor Deepa ... Respondents 1 to 3/Petitioners
4. V.Santhi ...4th respondent/1st respondent
5. C.A.Udhayakumar ...5th respondent/3rd respondent Prayer : This Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.06.2003 made in M.C.O.P.No.316 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Krishnagiri.
For Appellant : Mr.K.S.Narasimhan
JUDGMENT
In respect of death of one Raja, the parents and sister of the deceased filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.316 of 2002 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Krishnagiri, claiming compensation of Rs.9,00,000/-.
2. As against the claim made, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.4,42,500/- as compensation, payable with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit.
3. Challenging the quantum of compensation, this appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company.
4. The deceased was aged 21 years, a driver, earning a sum of Rs.4,000/- p.m. Monthly income has been fixed at Rs.3,000/-; deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses and adopting multiplier of 17, loss of dependency has been calculated at Rs.4,08,000/-; loss of love and affection has been awarded at Rs.5,000/- to each of the petitioners (Rs.5,000 x 3 = Rs.15,000/-); loss of expectation of life has been awarded at Rs.5,000/- to each of the petitioners (Rs.5,000 x 3 = Rs.15,000/-); cremation expenses has been awarded at Rs.2,500/-; transport expenses has been awarded at Rs.2,000/-; the total award is at Rs.4,42,500/-.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the compensation awarded towards loss of dependency is excessive.
6. It is relevant to point out that the Tribunal did not take future prospective increase in income while quantifying the compensation, as the deceased was aged only 21 years. Therefore, the award cannot be said to be excessive.
7. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed, confirming the award dated 17.06.2003 passed in M.C.O.P.No.316 of 2002 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Krishnagiri.
8. The Insurance Company shall deposit the entire amount of compensation along with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit, less the amount already deposited if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the major claimants are permitted to withdraw their share of the amount as per the apportionment made by the Tribunal. The minor claimant would have attained majority as on date. Hence, the Tribunal shall permit the minor claimant to withdraw her share of the amount on producing necessary documents. No costs.
22.02.2017 ogy To 1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Krishnagiri.
Dr.S.VIMALA, J.
ogy C.M.A.No.899 of 2017 22.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in