Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ompal And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10929 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ompal And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rekha Pundir,Sri K.R. Sirohi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the Consolidation Officer concerned as respondent no.6 on whose behalf notice stands deemed to have been accepted by the office of Chief Standing Counsel.
Heard Shri K.R.Sirohi, Learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Yogesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rajesh Yadav learned counsel for respondent no.5 and the learned Standing Counsel.
It is submitted by Learned Senior Counsel that the ends of justice would be served if an appropriate direction is issued to the Consolidation Officer concerned to consider and dispose of the pending restoration application dated 25.10.2017 alongwith delay under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act either on the next date or within a stipulated period else, the petitioners shall be put to grave and irreparable loss.
Learned Standing Counsel states that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending and the same be disposed off by giving appropriate direction to the respondent concerned.
This writ petition is disposed off with the direction to Consolidation Officer concerned to consider and dispose of the pending restoration application dated 25.10.2017 alongwith delay under Section 9-A(2) as Case No.307/17 as expeditiously as possible preferably on the next date fixed but not later than 3 months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes that they shall not seek any adjournment.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Service of certified copy of this order upon the respondent concerned shall constitute sufficient notice upon him to submit a compliance report.
The authority concerned shall submit Compliance report in Chambers on 17.8.018 at 4:00 P.M.
Order Date :- 27.3.2018 RS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ompal And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Rekha Pundir Sri K R Sirohi