IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.35964 OF 2019(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
OMKAR ELECTRICALS LIGHTING GENERATOR, REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR, GURUNATH K, HAVING ADDRESS AT NO.216, NARAYANA SHASTRY ROAD, (NEAR RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTT ROAD) K R MOHALLA, MYSURU-570024.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI.GAUTAM NETTAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU – 560 001.
2. THE DEPARTMENT OF KANNADA AND CULTURE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MULTI STORIED BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU – 560 001.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL OFFICER DASARA MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU – 570 004.
4. THE SUPERINTENDING OFFICER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSURU – 570 004.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.BALAKRISHNA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS MORE PARTICULARLY 3RD AND THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO TAKE ACTION AS REQUESTED UNDER ANNX-A AND B AT THE EARLIEST AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.Gautham Nettar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.B.Balakrishna, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Taking into account the order which this Court proposes to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent No.4.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take action as requested under Annexures-A and B at the earliest.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation at Annexure-A in accordance with law.
4. In view of the submission made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation at Annexure-A submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-