Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ombabu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1530 of 2016 Applicant :- Ombabu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Radhey Shyam Yadav,Navin Kumar Pandey,Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prashant Verma
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Counter and rejoinder affidavits filed in Court today, are taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in case crime No.181/2014 under Sections 302 IPC police station Kampil District Farrukhabad with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.
I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the FIR and also the bail rejection order. I have also perused the statements of the eye witnesses, namely, Rajveer and Soney Lal who have given their consistent testimony.
Accused-applicant has been named in the FIR and a specific role has also been assigned to him.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and after perusing the averments as contained in the present bail application and also looking to the seriousness of the allegations as made in the FIR, gravity of the offence and severity of the punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected.
However, looking to the period of detention of the applicant, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the court below be decided expeditiously, as early as possible on day to day basis in accordance with Section 309 Cr.P.C. and also in view of principle as has been laid down in the recent judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220.
It is made clear that in case, the witnesses are not appearing before the court concerned, liberty is being given to the concerned court to take necessary coercive measures in accordance with law for ensuring the presence of the witnesses.
Office is directed to forward a copy of this order to the concerned court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 Anand
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ombabu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 March, 2018
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Radhey Shyam Yadav Navin Kumar Pandey Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar