Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Om Prakash vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 25213 of 2018 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Autar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
This petition assails an order of suspension in terms of which disciplinary proceedings have been initiated on the respondents finding the petitioner being in a state of intoxication while on duty. While learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that the petitioner was not intoxicated, this assertion cannot possibly be evaluated by this Court since it will form part of the disciplinary proceedings, which are yet to commence. The further submission of learned counsel that there is no prohibition against the petitioner drinking while on duty is noticed only to be rejected bearing in mind the provisions of the conduct Rules.
The petition is misconceived and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.11.2018 cks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Om Prakash vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 November, 2018
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Ram Autar Verma