Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

N.V.Tejkiran vs K.Baghyalakshmi

Madras High Court|19 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.3349 of 2016 from the file of the Principal Judge Family Court, Chennai and transfer to the file of the Sub Court,Kancheepuram, for being tried along with H.M.O.P.No.85 of 2016 pending on its file.
2. The petitioner is the husband and respondent is the wife. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was conducted on 12.09.2014 as per Hindu rites and custom. Due to difference of opinion arose between the petitioner and respondent, both of them are living separately. The respondent filed H.M.O.P.No.3349 of 2016 for divorce on the ground of cruelty, before the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennai. The petitioner has also filed H.M.O.P.No.85 of 2016 for restitution of conjugal rights on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Kancheepuram.
3. According to the petitioner, he is residing at Manapakkam, Kancheepuram District. The distance between Chennai and Kancheepuram is more than 70 kilo metres and hence, it is very difficult for his to travel from Chennai to Kancheepuram to attend the hearing. Therefore, he prays for transfer of H.M.O.P.No.3349 of 2016 from the file of the Principal Judge Family Court to the file of the Sub-Court, Kancheepuram and to try along with H.M.O.P.No.85 of 2016 pending on its file.
4. Notice has been sent to the respondent and the same was returned with an endorsement 'unclaimed'. This Court has directed the Registry to print the name of the respondent in the cause list. Though the name of the respondent has been printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of him either in person or through counsel.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. It is well settled law that whenever, the transfer application is filed in matrimonial disputes, the convenience of the wife shall be given preference, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Judgments reported in 2008 (9) SCC 353 [Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and another Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta] and AIR 2002 SC 396 [Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another].
7. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner along with the above decision, the petition in H.M.O.P.No.3349 of 2015 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court and transferred to the file of the Sub-Court, Kancheepuram and to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.85 V.M.VELUMANI,J., nvi of 2016. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to H.M.O.P.No.85 of 2016 to the file of the Sub-Court, Kancheepuram, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Sub-Court, Kancheepuram, is directed to dispose of the case, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than six months from the date of receipt of the said records.
8. Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
19.06.2017 nvi To
1.The Family Court, Chennai
2. The Sub-Court, Kancheepuram Tr.C.M.P. Nos.722 of 2016 C.M.P.No.18682 of 2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

N.V.Tejkiran vs K.Baghyalakshmi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
19 June, 2017