Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Nooru vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20754 of 2021 Applicant :- Nooru Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Belal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Heard Sri Abdul Majid, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohammad Belal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.487 of 2020, under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Garhmukteshwar, District Hapur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per FIR version, 05 accused were arrested on the spot along with 2.0 quintal beef. In the confessional statement of the accused name of applicant and his brother Seenu surfaced. Seenu has been enlarged on bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.20461 of 2021 vide order dated 20.05.2021. He further submits that co-accused Guddu and Soyeb have also been enlarged on bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.4839 and 1384 of 2021 vide orders dated 22.01.2021and 18.01.2021 respectively. Applicant has criminal history of 18 cases, which have been explained in para 02 of the supplementary affidavit. He also submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 05.03.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and submits that applicant has criminal history of 18 cases in which several cases are registered of similar nature.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, name of applicant surfaced in confessional statement of co-accused & enlargement of co-accused on bail and perusing the materials on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Nooru involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
Digitally signed by Justice Ali Zamin Date: 2021.08.02 09:54:00 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 MAA/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nooru vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2021
Judges
  • Ali Zamin
Advocates
  • Mohammad Belal