;kph ds HkkbZ de:y glu] ftldk ekeyk ;kph ds gh leku gS] ds izdj.k MISC. SINGLE No. - 18663 of 2019 esa mPp U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB }kjk fn0 15-07-2019 dks ikfjr fd;k x;k vkns'k fuEuor~ gS %& "In pursuance of the earlier order dated 09.07.2019 a week time was granted to the learned AGA for filing the counter affidavit, today again the prayer is made for one week further time. The prayer is allowed by giving last opportunity, in case the counter affidavit is not filed by the next date of listing then the cost of Rs. 5000/- will be imposed on the concerned Officer.
List this case on 23.07.2019."
ijUrq mDr vkns'k ds ckotwn izR;FkhZx.k dh vksj ls dksbZ Hkh izfr'kiFki= u rks MISC. SINGLE No. - 18663 of 2019 esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS vkSj u gh bl ;kfpdk esa rFkk fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk ;g dgk x;k fd og fcuk izfr'kiFki= nkf[ky fd, gh eqdnesa esa cgl djus dks rS;kj gSaA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esas mHk; i{k dh cgl lquh x;hA ;kph dh vksj ls Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 226 ds vUrxZr izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk] okn la0 [email protected] ¼m0iz0 jkT; izfr uwj glu½ vUrxZr /kkjk [email protected] m0 iz0 xq.Mk dUVzksy ,sDV] 1970 esa vij ftykf/kdkjh] ¼iz'kklu½ y[kuÅ }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fn0 12-04-2019 ,oa blds fo:) nkf[ky vihy la0 [email protected] ¼de:y glu izfr m0iz0 jkT; vkfn½ esa vk;qDr y[kuÅ e.My] y[kuÅ }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fn0 24-06-2019 ds fo:) ;ksftr dh x;h gSA ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh lrh'k dqekj 'kekZ ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk Jh ,y0 ts0 ekS;kZ dks lqukA ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk vius rdksZ esa dgk x;k gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk iz'uxr vkns'k ekeys ds laiw.kZ rF;ksa vkSj ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij leqfpr fopkj fd, fcuk xyr o voS/kkfud :i ls ikfjr fd;s x;s gSa] tks xyr o fof/k fo:) gksus ds dkj.k fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSaA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ;kph o eq0v0la0 0267 lu~ 2017 o 0426 lu~ 2017 Fkkuk efygkckn] ftyk y[kuÅ ds ifjoknh fd'ku yky ds e/; Hkwfe fookn dks ysdj nhokuh eqdnek py jgk gS] ftlds dkj.k og xyr o uktk;t ncko cukus ds fy, ckj ckj ;kph o mlds ifjokjtuksa ds fo:) xyr o >wBh f'kdk;r djrk gSA ;kph ds f[kykQ n'kkZ, x, 3 eqdneksa esa eq0v0la0 [email protected] vUrxZr /kkjk 353] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 o"kZ 2013 dk gS rFkk nks eqdnesa] eq0v0la0 [email protected] vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa eq0v0la0 [email protected] vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 lu~ 2017 ds gaS] tks mijksDr fd'ku yky dh vksj ls nk;j fd;s x;s gSaA mijksDr oknksa ds vfrfjDr ;kph ds fo:) dksbZ vU; vijkf/kd okn lafLFkr ugha gSA mDr lHkh okn vf/kdre 7 o"kZ dh vof/k ls n.Muh; gksus ds dkj.k muesa ;kph dh fxjQ~rkjh ugha dh x;h gS vkSj u gh U;k;ky; ls mls dksbZ lEeu izkIr gqvk gSA ;kph ds fo:) ,slh dksbZ lk{; o lkexzh i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gS ftlls ;g fl) gksrk gks fd ;kph uwj glu ,d 'kkfrj fdLe dk ncax] euc<+ ,oa xq.Mk vijk/kh gS] mlus vius xkao dh turk esa Hk; o vkrad dk ekgkSy QSyk;k gqvk gS] mlds vkijkf/kd dqd`R;ksa ls vke turk esa dkQh Hk; O;kIr gS] mlds Mj ds dkj.k turk dk dksbZ Hkh O;fDr mlds fo:) Fkkuk ij fjiksVZ fy[kkus o xokgh nsus dk lkgl ugha dj ikrk gSA ;kph ds fo:) izLrqr mijksDr vk'k; dh iqfyl vk[;k xyr] feF;k o Hkzked gSA vius mijksDr rdksZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus viuh vkLFkk Lalani Pandey @ Vijay Shanker Pandey Versus State of U.P. & Ors. 011(1) JIC 503 (All)(LB) ij izdV dh gSA mDr rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; o lkexzh dk lE;d ewY;kadu djus ds ckn tks iz'uxr vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x, gSa os iw.kZr;k lgh o fof/k lEer gSa] muesa dksbZ =qfV ugha gS rFkk ;kfpdk fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa }kjk izLrqr mijksDr rdksZ ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd fopkj fd;k rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; o lkexzh dk lko/kkuhiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;kA ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr Lalani Pandey @ Vijay Shanker Pandey Versus State of U.P. & Ors. 011(1) JIC 503 (All)(LB) fof/k O;oLFkk ds izLrj 14 ls 22 esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk dgk x;k gS fd %& "14. Whether the accused can be treated as 'goonda' or not? It will be necessary to consider the meaning of word 'goonda' as provided in the Act. Section 2 (b) of the Act defines the word 'goonda' as follows:
2 (b) 'Goonda' means a person who -
(i) either by himself or as a member or leader of a gang, habitually commits or attempts to commit, or abets the commission of an offence punishable under Section 153 or Section 153-B or Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code or Chapter XV, Chapter XVI, Chapter XVII or Chapter XXII of the said Code; or
(ii) has been convicted for an offence punishable under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; or
(iii) has been convicted not less than thrice for an offence punishable under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 or the Public Gambling Act, 1867 or Section 25, Section 27 or Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959; or
(iv) is generally reputed to be a person who is desperate and dangerous to the community; or
(v) has been habitually passing indecent remarks or teasing women or girls; or
(vi) is a tout; or
(vii) is a house grabber.
15. In this case the accused has not been treated as 'goonda' on the grounds mentioned in clause 2 (b) (ii) to (vii) of the Act as referred above. He has been treated as goonda under clause 2 (b) (i) of the Act. As per definition of goonda as contained in clause 2 (b) (i) of the Act, a person can be teated as goonda only when he is habitually involved in commission of offence as mentioned therein. The word goonda carries on the meaning that a person who by habit is involved to commit repeated offences as mentioned above will be treated as 'goonda'. One or two criminal cases against a person will not be sufficient to hold him that he is habitually involved in commission of such offences and he is a 'goonda'.
16. In the case of Shankar Ji Shukla v. Ayukt, Allahabad Mandal, Allahabad and Others (supra) the word 'habitually' came for consideration before this Court. The court relying on its previous judgment in the case of Imaran @ Abdul Qaddus Khan v. State of U.P. And others reported in 2000 (Suppl.) ACC 171 (Alld) as well as the case of Vijay Narain Singh V State of Bihar and Others reported in (1984) 3 SCC 14 decided by the Hon'ble Apex Court held that a single or two acts of the accused will not be sufficient to hold that he is habitually involved in commission of the offences referred in the Act. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble court finds place in para 6 of the judgment which is being extracted below:
"..... 6. The emphasis is on the work habitual and a single or two acts after a long gap does not amount to the term 'Habitually'. The expression 'habitually' means 'repeatedly' or 'persistently'. It implies a thread of continuity stringing together similar repetitive acts. Repeated, persistent and similar, but not isolated, individual and dissimilar acts are necessary to justify an inference of habit. It connotes frequent commission of acts or omissions of the same kind. Because, the idea of 'habit' involves an element of persistence and a tendency to repeat the acts or omissions of the same kind, if the acts or omissions in question are not of the same kind or even if they are of the same kind when they are committed with a long interval of time between them, they cannot be treated as habitual ones. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relied on the case of Imaran @ Abdul Qaddus Khan V. State of U.P. And Others. In imran's case (supra), the Court relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vijay Narain Singh V. State of Bihar and Others, for defining the term 'Goonda'. It was further held in Imaran's case (supra) that even the minority view which was taken in Vijay Narain's case (supra) was that the word 'habitually' means 'by force of habit'. From the facts found above I find that the petitioner is not a habitual offender and he cannot be brought under the term 'Goonda' as defined under the Act........."
17. In this case, in counter affidavit filed by Awadhesh Kumar Awasthi, Sub Inspector, P.S. Saraini, District Raebareli, it has been specifically stated that the petitioner has a criminal history of as many as 9 cases but in the impugned notice issued by the learned Additional District Magistrate, only two cases as referred above have been mentioned therein, therefore, the criminal history of rest cases cannot be a ground to treat the petitioner as goonda which do not find place in the impugned order. If the criminal history of those cases would have been mentioned in the impugned notice, they could be considered for holding the accused as goonda. Since only two criminal cases have been referred in the impugned notice issued by the learned Additional District Magistrate to the petitioner hence only those two cases cannot be considered to determine as to whether the petitioner is goonda.
18. From a perusal of the impugned notice issued by the Additional District Magistrate, Raebareli, it appears that two criminal cases are mentioned therein. The first case is case Crime No. 345/09, under Sections 452/323/504/506/324 IPC and 3 (1) (10) SC/ST Act and the second case is case Crime No. 1029/09, under Sections 436/504/506/427 IPC and 3 (1) (10) SC/ST Act. From a perusal of the copy of the F.I.R. of these two cases, it appears that both the cases had been registered by the police in pursuant to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate on the applications moved by the respective complainants under Section 156 (3) of the Code. It appears that the complainants of those cases had approached the police first and informed about the commission of the offence and when no F.I.R. was registered by the police then they had to move applications under Section 156 (3) of the Code before the concerned Magistrate for a direction to the S.O. of Police Station concerned to register and investigate the case against the accused. As per version of the police, the accused is a man of goonda nature and no one dares to be witness against him. If the police had got such impression against the accused, it was expected that it should have registered a case against the accused when the complainants approached before it for registration of the F.I.R. but the police did not register the case.
19. In the case of Shankar Ji Shukla v. Ayukt, Allahabad Mandal, Allahabad and Others (supra), it has been held that a person cannot be held to be 'goonda' only on the basis of one or two acts, a person can be held to be goonda only when he is in habit of committing repeated offences.
20. In this case, only two criminal cases have been shown against the accused which too were registered by the police in pursuant to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate on the applications moved by the respective complainants under Section 156 (3) of the Code. The petitioner on the basis of these two cases cannot be said to be habitually involved in commission of offences as defined under Section 2 (1) (b) of the Act. He, therefore, cannot be held to be goonda.
21. From a perusal of the impugned judgment passed by the learned District Magistrate as well as the appellate order passed by the learned Commissioner, it appears that both the authorities fail to consider the requirement of Section 2 (1) (b) of the Act for declaring the petitioner as goonda. The impugned order passed by the learned District Magistrate, Raebareli, as well as the impugned order passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner, Lucknow, are bad in the eye of law and liable to be quashed and the writ petition deserves to succeed.
22. The writ petition is, therefore, allowed and the impugned order of externment of the petitioner dated 15.7.2010 passed by the District Magistrate, Raebareli as well as the impugned judgment and order dated 08.9.2010 passed by the Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow are hereby quashed."
;kph }kjk ifjokn i= fnukafdr 06-06-2018 ds fo:) nkf[ky vkifRr ds izLrj 8 o vxzsrj izLrjksa esa fuEu dFku fd;s x;s gSa %& **8& ;g fd Fkkuk LFkkuh; iqfyl }kjk tks eqdnesa ntZ gksuk crk;k x;k gS] og fdlh Hkh :i ls xq.Mk fu;a=.k vf/kfu;e dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSa D;ksafd izkFkhZ rFkk mlds HkkbZ ln~nke o de:y glu ds fo:) tks eqdnesa xzke egyk ds fd'ku yky iq= jke pju ds }kjk gh ntZ djk;s x;s gSa rFkk ogh oknh eqdnek gS D;ksafd izkFkhZ dh iRuh iwoZ iz/kku vkbZjhu ckuksa ls oknh eqdnek fd'ku yky ls ,d [k.Mgy dh ckor nks okn nhokuh U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gSa] mUgha nhokuh oknksa dh [kqUul ds dkj.k fd'ku yky ds }kjk izkFkhZ rFkk mlds Hkkb;ksa ds fo:) Fkkuk gktk ij xyr izdkj ls ntZ djkrk jgrk gS] izkFkfedh dh QksVks izfr layXu dh tk jgh gSA 9& ;g fd izkFkhZ dh Nfo rFkk pky pyu lekt rFkk xkao okyksa ds izfr xq.MkRed ;k nq"izsfjr gksrh rks mlds ifjokj esa iz/kkuh ugha vkrhA 10& ;g fd izkFkhZ mDr izdj.k esa viuh lk{; Hkh nsus dks rS;kj gSA lk{khx.k ds uke bl izdkj gSa %& ¼1½ latw dqekj mQZ iIiw iq= dYyw iwoZ ch0Mh0lh0 ¼2½ jktw iq= ljtw izlkn] orZeku ch0Mh0lh0 ¼3½ jQhd vgen iq= d<+hys] iwoZ ch0Mh0lh0 ¼4½ equhj vyh iq= gler vyh] iwoZ ch0Mh0lh0 ¼5½ tScqy glu iq= eks0 gqlSu] iwoZ iz/kku ¼6½ oghn vgen iq= d<+hys iwoZ ch0Mh0lh0A lHkh fuoklhx.k xzke dgyk Fkkuk efygkckn] tuin y[kuÅA 11& ;g fd izkFkhZ ds fo:) tks Hkh xyr lwpuk,a Fkkuk gktk ij nh xbZ gSa og ek= fd'ku yky ds }kjk nh x;h gSa izkFkhZ ds fo:) {ks= ds fdlh Hkh vU; lnL; }kjk Fkkuk gktk ij f'kdk;r ugha dh x;h gSA 12& ;g fd izkFkhZ dh iRuh iwoZ iz/kku Jherh vkbjhu ckuksa ds }kjk oknh eqdnek fd'ku yky o mlds ifjokj okyksa ds fo:) tks izkFkZuk i= mPp vf/kdkjh dks fn;s x;s gSa] og lHkh layXu izkFkZuk i= gSaA** ;g ,d LohdkjkRed rF; gS fd ;kph dh iRuh Jherh vkbjhu ckuksa rRle; xzke iz/kku Fkh rFkk mlus eq0v0la0 0267 lu~ 2017 o 0426 lu~ 2017 Fkkuk efygkckn] ftyk y[kuÅ ds oknh fd'ku yky ds fo:) iz'kklu dks vko';d dk;Zokgh djus gsrq dbZ izkFkZuk i= fn, Fks] tSlk fd layXud la0 5 ds lkFk layXu izkFkZuk i= fnukafdr 19-01-2018] 17-01-2018] 18-07-2018 ,oa 14-07-2018 ls Li"V gS] ijUrq iz'kklu }kjk ml laca/k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh u djds mlds ifr o ifjokjhtu ln~nke o de:y glu ds fo:) xq.Mk ,sDV dh dk;Zokgh dh x;h] ;g Hkh Li"V gS fd ;kph ds fo:) mfYyf[kr 3 eqdneksa esa ls 2 ek= mDr fd'ku yky }kjk fy[kk;s x;s eqdnesa gSa ftuls ;kph dk nhokuh eqdnek py jgk gS rFkk og ckj ckj leku rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij ;kph ds fo:) dkuwuh dk;Zokgh dj jgk gSA ;g Hkh ,d LohdkjkRed rF; gS fd mDr lHkh vkijkf/kd okn 7 o"kZ ls de vof/k ds fy, n.Muh; gSaA esjs }kjk n'kkZ, x, mijksDr dkj.ksa ls ;g Li"V gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk iz'uxr vkns'k ikfjr djrs le; ;kph dh vksj ls mldh vkifRr esa mfYyf[kr mDr rF;ksa ij fopkj ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk mudh mis{kk djds tks iz'uxr vkns'k ikfjr fd, x, gSa os xyr o voS/kkfud gSaA mDr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fn0 12-04-2019 o 24-06-2019 vikLr fd, tkrs gSa rFkk ekeyk vij ftykf/kdkjh] ¼iz'kklu½ y[kuÅ dks mDr rF;ksa ij fopkj djrs gq, i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ dk leqfpr volj iznku djds iqu% u, fljs ls fu.kZ; fn, tkus gsrq izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gSA vkns'k fnukad %& 30-07-2019 ds0lh0flag