Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Nomi vs Dsg Buildwell Private Limited 36/5

High Court Of Karnataka|25 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA COMPANY PETITION NO.176/2015 BETWEEN:
M/S NOMI & CO.
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING OFFICE AT NO.20, SUKEAS LANE, KOLKATA – 700 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR.FAKRUDDIN [BY MS SANVEETHA.M, ADV. FOR MS K.K.THAYAMMA, ADV.] ... PETITIONER AND:
DSG BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED 36/5, SOUL SPACE ARENA, UPPER BASEMENT, MARATHALLI OUTER RING ROAD, DODDANEKUNDI, BENGALURU – 560 048.
[BY MR P.B. ACHAPPA, ADV.] …RESPONDENT THIS COMPANY PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 434 READ WITH SECTION 433[E] & [F] OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, PRAYING TO PASS ORDER THAT THE COMPANY DSG BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 36/5, SOUL SPACE ARENA, UPPER BASEMENT, MARATHALLI OUTER RING ROAD, DODDANEKUNDI, BENGALURU – 560 048, KARNATAKA, MAY BE - 2 -
WOUND UP BY THE COURT UNDER SECTIONS 433(E) AND (F) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner Ms Sanveetha.M submits that she has no instructions to appear in the matter since the file has been returned to the petitioner.
No alternative arrangement is made by the petitioner. Hence, the Company Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Nomi vs Dsg Buildwell Private Limited 36/5

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 October, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha Company