Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Nitin Kumar Saroj vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 May, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. through video conferencing in view of COVID-19 pandemic.
2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in pursuance to the First Information Report registered as Case Crime No. 88 of 2016, under Sections 308, 323, 325, 506 of IPC, Police Station Kohdaur, District Pratapgarh.
3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case as applicant has previous enmity with the complainant and in fact applicant was in Delhi at the time of incident. It has been further submitted that co-accused of this case namely Arun, has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by means of order dated 25.10.2016 passed in Bail No. 8623 of 2016. A copy of the bail order has been annexed as Annexure No.10 to the bail application. It is further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 03.02.2021 and is not having any criminal antecedents and there is no apprehension that after being released on bail he may flee from the course of law or may otherwise misuse the liberty.
4. Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for grant of bail but he has fairly conceded that co-accused of this case namely Arun has already been granted bail.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties as well as the fact that co-accused of the case has already been granted bail and, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.
6. Let applicant Nitin Kumar Saroj be released on bail in aforesaid case on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and proceed against the applicant in accordance with law.
8. The application stands disposed of.
9. The party shall file computer generated copy of order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by him alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (s) (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
10. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of the computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 7.5.2021 Mohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nitin Kumar Saroj vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 May, 2021
Judges
  • Alok Mathur