Court No. - 3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20007 of 2018 Petitioner :- Niteesh And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A. G. A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F. I. R. dated 30.4.2018 which has been registered as Case Crime No. 487 of 2018, under Sections-498A,406, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, police station Kankerkhera, district Meerut so far it relates to the petitioners.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that on account of matrimonial discord between the spouses, petitioner No. 1-husband and his family members have been falsely implicated in the present case by the respondent No.3 on general allegations, therefore, criminal prosecution of the petitioners is in clear contravention of the settled principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in (2012) 10 Supreme Court Cases 741 in the matter of Geeta Mehrotra and another versus State of Uttar Pradesh. It is further contended that the first information report has been lodged after two years of the alleged incident, which itself falsifies the prosecution story. He further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the F. I. R., which is a bundle of lies and product of malice, no credible evidence is forthcoming, even prima facie, indicating that any such incident had taken place, hence the impugned F. I. R. is liable to be quashed.
Per contra, learned A. G. A. submitted that from the perusal of the impugned F. I. R. it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out, hence the impugned F. I. R. is not liable to be quashed.
From the perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein prima facie cognizable offence is made out hence, there is no scope for interfering with the impugned F. I. R.
Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F. I. R. is refused.
However, considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and nature of allegations made in the F. I. R., it is directed that the petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case till submission of police report under Section 173 (2) or till credible evidence is collected, whichever is earlier.
With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 faraz