Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Nishan E Ghouse Pak And Others vs M/S The Margarine & Refined

High Court Of Karnataka|23 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA WRIT PETITION NO.17844 OF 2012 (GM-WAKF) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.22426 OF 2013 (GM-WAKF) IN W.P.No.17844/2012 BETWEEN:
1. NISHAN-E-GHOUSE-PAK (SUNNI) BY IT’S PRESIDENT MR.AKMAL PASHA S/O LATE BASHA SAB RESIDING AT NO.485, 16TH CROSS DEVARAJEURS NAGAR, VINAYAKA NAGAR MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 026 2. KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 560 052 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI M.S.RAJENDRA PRASAD, SR.COUNSEL ALONG WITH SMT. S.R.ANURADHA, ADV., WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER No.2 V.C.O.DT.13.03.2013) AND:
M/S. THE MARGARINE & REFINED OIL (PVT) LIMITED NO.148, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE – 560 026 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SRI C.MANJESH S/O. LATE B.K.CHANNANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI K BALAKRISHNA, AND SRI D.S.NAGARAJ, ADVs.,) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.28.3.12 PASSED BY THE P.O. OF THE KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.18/2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., IN W.P.No.22426/2013 BETWEEN KARNATAKA BOARD OF WAKFS ‘DARUL AWKAF NO.6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE -560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …PETITIONER (BY SMT. S.R.ANURADHA, ADV.,) AND 1. M/S.THE MARGARINE & REFINED OILS CO. LTD., NO.148, MYSORE ROAD POST BAG NO.2615 BANGALORE – 560026 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR NIRANJAN C S/O SRI B.K.CHAMANNA 2. NISHAN-E-GHOUSE PAK (SUNNI) BY SYED AHMED, SECRETARY NISHAN-E-GHOUSE PAK (SUNNI) GORIPALYA, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE – 560 026 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.BALAKRISHNA & SRI D.S.NAGARAJ, ADV., FOR R1;
SRI M.S.RAJENDRA PRASAD, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI M/S. M.S.MUKARAM AND ASSTS., FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.28.3.12 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER OF THE KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.18/2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned senior counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.17844/2012 and learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.22426/2013, seek leave to convert these petitions as civil revision petitions, in view of the decision of this court in the case of ‘DEEPAK SHETTY AND ANOTHER Vs. KARNATAKA WAKF BOARD’ reported in 2015 (2) AKR 833.
2. In that view, the leave sought for is granted.
Registry is directed to permit learned counsel for the petitioner to convert these petitions as Civil Revision Petitions and list before the Court having the roster. For the purpose of records, these writ petitions shall be rounded off as disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE HJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nishan E Ghouse Pak And Others vs M/S The Margarine & Refined

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
23 October, 2017
Judges
  • A S Bopanna