Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Nirmal vs Mafatlal

High Court Of Gujarat|02 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned advocate Ms. Vinita Naik for learned advocate Mr. B.T. Rao for the applicant seeks permission to delete respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Permission to delete name of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 is granted. Applicant to carry out amendment forthwith.
Heard learned advocate for the parties. Having regard to the averments made in the application not controverted by filing any reply and oral submissions, the applicant has shown sufficient cause to condone the delay. Hence this application is required to be allowed.
In the result, the application is allowed. Delay of 359 days in preferring application for leave to appeal is condoned. Rule made absolute.
(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J) (pkn) Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nirmal vs Mafatlal

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
02 May, 2012