IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT APPEAL NOS.3192-3199 OF 2018 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
1. NINGAPPA S/O MALLAPPA BADIGER AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS STAFF NURSE 2. DURGAPPA PADASALI S/O BHIMAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS STAFF NURSE 3. RAMESH S/O MANIKAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS STAFF NURSE 4. SMT. GANGAMANI B R W/O SANJAY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS STAFF NURSE 5. SHAMSHAD BEGUM WALIKAR W/O MAHEBOOB SAB AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS STAFF NURSE 6. SHOBHA H K W/O SOMASHEKAR S AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS STAFF NURSE 7. SHOBHA R K W/O NAVEEN P AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS STAFF NURSE 8. SOWMYA SUDHA N R W/O BALASUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS STAFF NURSE (ALL THE APPELLANTS WERE WORKING ON CONTRACT BASIS IN KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY) DR. M. M. MARIGOWDA ROAD BANGALORE-560 029 (BY SHRI SHAILENDRA M.R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPT., M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE – 560 001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION IN KARNATAKA ANANDA RAO CIRCLE BANGALORE-560009 3. KIDWAI CANCER INSTITUTE/ KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY DR M.H. MARIGOWDA ROAD BANGALORE-560029 4. KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003 ... APPELLANTS ... RESPONDENTS (SHRI S.H. PRASHANTH, AGA FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 & 2 SHRI ARAVIND.V.CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT No.3) ---
THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10/9/2018 OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NOS.31765- 31843/2018 [S-RES] AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION BY GRANTING THE PAYERS SOUGHT FOR IN THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellants states that with the passage of time, the controversy in the appeals does not survive and accordingly, the appeals be disposed of.
Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of.
The requirement of deposit of cost amount is waived.
The pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE AHB