IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B. V. NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.453 OF 2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. NINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS W/O. SIDDEGOWDA @ JOGAPPA RESIDENT OF HULIGEREPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK.
2. SMT. CHIKKATHAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O. NINGEGOWDA RESIDENT OF KALLIMELEDODDI VILLAGE C. A. KERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK.
3. SMT. C. G. JYOTHI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS W/O. H. M. JAYARAMU RESIDENT OF HULIGEREPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK.
4. SMT. PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O. SANNAMARIGOWDA RESIDENT OF CHIKKARASINAKERE VILLAGE C. A. KERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK.
5. SMT. C. S. SHANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O. D. B. NAGARAJU RESIDENT OF DEVIPURA VILLAGE KIRUGAVALU HOBLI MALAVALLI TALUK.
(BY SRI HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA FOR SRI H.C. SHIVARAMU, ADV.) ... PETITIONERS AND:
1. MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O. LATE SIDDEGOWDA KSRTC EMPLOYEE RESIDENT OF 10TH CROSS CHAMUNDESHWARINAGARA MANDYA CITY.
2. PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O. SIDDEGOWDA RESIDENT OF CHIKKARASINAKERE VILLAGE CHIKKARASINAKERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK.
3. C. S. KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O. LATE SIDDEGOWDA ASST. ENGINEER CAUVERY NIRAVARI NIGAMA MANDYA DIVISION MANDYA RESIDING AT DOOR NO.727 8TH CROSS, KALLAHALLI V. V. NAGARA MANDYA CITY.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHANTESH S. HOSMATH, ADV. FOR R-1; R-2 AND 3 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16-12-2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADDUR, IN M.A. NO.02 OF 2014 ON I.A.1 AT ANNEXURE-F AND RESTORE THE ORDER DATED 20-1-2014 PASSED IN O.S.121 OF 2013 BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. AT MADDUR ON I.A.1 AT ANNEXURE-E.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Petitioners’ counsel has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as the dispute between the parties have been compromised and amicably settled out of Court.
Memo is perused.
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, I.A. Nos.1 and 2 of 2016 are also dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE kvk