Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Nijamuddin vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15317 of 2018 Petitioner :- Nijamuddin Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing standing counsel for the State-respondents and perused the material available on record.
This petition for writ is preferred to have a writ, order or direction for the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession on the Abadi land, said to be in possession of the petitioner.
Having considered all facts stated in the petition for writ we are of the opinion that the appropriate course before the petitioner for redressal of his grievance is by way of filing a civil suit before the competent Civil Court. No interference in writ jurisdiction is desirable. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
The petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 pk (Jayant Banerji,J.) (Govind Mathur,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nijamuddin vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Govind Mathur
Advocates
  • Parvesh Kumar Pandey