IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA WRIT PETITION No.6566/2016 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN:
M/S. NETRA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.2964, 12TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, H A L 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE-560038 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. N MADHAVA RAJ ... PETITIONER (BY SRI AJESH KUMAR S, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (KIADB) # 49, 4TH & 5TH FLOOR, ‘EAST WING’, KHANIJA BHAWAN RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 3. KARNATAKA BIOTECHNOLOGY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (KBITS) DEPARTMENT OF IT, BT & S&T GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHAN SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 4. M/S GOEL GANGA REALITY PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GANGA CHELSTON SILVER SPRING ROAD, BEHIND BAGEECHAR RESTAURANT MARATHALLI WHTEFIELD BENGALURU-560065 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI DILDAR SHIRALLI, HCGP. FOR R1 SRI P V CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R2) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, WITH A PRAYER TO QUASH THE LETTER DATED 04.11.2015 VIDE ANNEX-A ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NOT TO EXECUTE ANY DEED OR DOCUMENTS IN THE NATURE OF LEASE-CUM-SALE DEED OR SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 COMPANY WITH REGARD TO THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned Government Advocate to accept notice for respondent No.1, Sri P.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel to accept notice for respondent No.2. They are permitted to file their Memo of Appearance/Vakalath in four weeks.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 07.12.2017 seeking leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if the need arises in future.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
Sd/- JUDGE hrp/bms