Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Neetu @ Neetoo vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 7
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3919 of 2018 Applicant :- Neetu @ Neetoo Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Niklank Kumar Jain,Anant Kumar Gupta,Suneel Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State as well as perused the record.
This repeat bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant, seeking enlargement on bail during the trial in connection with Crime No.84 of 2016 under Sections 302 and 120-B of IPC, Police Station Pilua, District Etah.
Earlier bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court, vide order dated 23.10.2017.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the complainant has been examined as PW-1 and he has not stated anything adverse against the applicant.
Opposing the bail application, it has been argued by learned State Counsel that there are other eye-witnesses also to the incident who, till date, have not been examined.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular the fact that there are number of eyewitnesses to the incident, who are yet to be examined, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail. His repeat bail application is rejected. However, trial Court is directed to make all endeavour for early disposal of trial.
Order Date :- 29.5.2019 RKK/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neetu @ Neetoo vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2019
Judges
  • Pritinker Diwaker
Advocates
  • Niklank Kumar Jain Anant Kumar Gupta Suneel Kumar Yadav