Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Neeta And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7531 of 2021 Petitioner :- Neeta And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Mohan Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Vijay Prakash Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard Sri Surendra Mohan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vijay Prakash Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and Mrs. Archana Singh, learned A.G.A.-I, for the State-respondent.
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the first information report dated 23.7.2021, registered as Case Crime No. 82 of 2021, under Section 366 of IPC, Police Station- Lotan, District Siddharth Nagar.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the first information report dated 23.7.2021, registered as Case Crime No. 82 of 2021, under Section 366 of IPC, Police Station- Lotan, District Siddharth Nagar."
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have solemnized marriage with each other out of their own free will and living together, as such no offence under Section 363 and 366 I.P.C. is made out. They have applied for registration of their marriage.
Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to petitioner no. 1 to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, concerned, for recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., within a week from today. In the event of her appearance before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned within the stipulated period, the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned shall record her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and also ensure medical age determination of petitioner no. 1 and shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
For a period of three weeks no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioner along with a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.
The concerned Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 23.9.2021 Kamarjahan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeta And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 September, 2021
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Surendra Mohan Mishra