Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Neeraj vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14212 of 2021 Applicant :- Neeraj Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Nasiruzzaman,Mohit Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. None has appeared on behalf of first informant, despite service of notice.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submitted that victim girl has not made any allegation of kidnapping or of rape against applicant and that they both have married each other. It was submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 01.08.2020 having no criminal history and that in case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Perusal of record shows that as per certificate issued by C.M.O. Aligarh, the age of victim girl is about 17 years and that in her statement under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., she has clearly stated that she has gone with applicant with her own free will and she has married with applicant and they were residing as husband and wife.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
The bail application is allowed.
Let the Neeraj involved in Case Crime No.329 of 2020, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC & 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S.Tappal, District Aligarh, be released on bail on furnishing each a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel bail of applicant in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021 Neeraj
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeraj vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 August, 2021
Judges
  • Raj Beer Singh
Advocates
  • Nasiruzzaman Mohit Kumar Jaiswal