Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Neeraj vs State Of U P And Anr

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 17
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5738 of 2019
Applicant :- Smt. Neeraj
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr
Counsel for Applicant :- Pushpendra Singh,Abhitosh Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 18.12.2018 in Complaint Case No.431 of 2018 (Ravindra Kumar Vs. Rajpal And Others) under Section 494 I.P.C., passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Bulandshahar.
The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court in exercise of power conferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P. P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicant has got a right of discharge under the provisions of Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.
The prayer for quashing the proceedings is refused.
For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.
However, it is provided that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, then the bail application of the applicant be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court. For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Vibha Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Neeraj vs State Of U P And Anr

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Suresh Kumar Gupta
Advocates
  • Pushpendra Singh Abhitosh Mishra