Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Neeraj And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10664 of 2021 Applicant :- Neeraj And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Raj Prajapati,Dinesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge-sheet no. 161 of 2020, cognizance order dated 03.09.2020 and entire proceedings of Case No. 483 of 2020 (State Vs. Neeraj and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 170 of 2020, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kurara, District Hamirpur, pending in the court of Special Judge (POCSO Act), Hamirpur.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has only made a prayer for expeditious disposal of his bail application in view of law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Considering the prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if the applicants appear before the court below within one month from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of settled law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
For a period of one month from today or till the applicants appear and apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. However in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021/Nadim
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeraj And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 August, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Ram Raj Prajapati Dinesh Kumar Maurya