Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Neeraj Tyagi vs State Of Up

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23350 of 2018 Applicant :- Neeraj Tyagi Opposite Party :- State Of Up Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar,Ankit Srivastava,Udai Karan Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amul Kumar Tyagi
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
Sri A.K. Tyagi, learned counsel for the informant has been informed by learned counsel for the applicant in writing, but he is not present in Court. Informant ship is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Neeraj Tyagi with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.150 of 2018, under Sections 147, 302, 506, 427 IPC, Police Station Hapur Kotwali, District Hapur during pendency of trial.
Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused Ram Kumar has been granted bail by this Court on 10.10.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.38916 of 2018. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.3.2018. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.
Let the applicant Neeraj Tyagi involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeraj Tyagi vs State Of Up

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Amit Kumar Ankit Srivastava Udai Karan Saxena