Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15226 of 2018 Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Purushottam Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
The petitioner has come up praying for a mandamus that the respondent bank be directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for One Time Settlement and proceed to negotiate the same.
There is no scheme for One Time Settlement which may have any statutory force the enforcement whereof can be sought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This is purely a negotiable aspect arising out of a contract of loan for which a writ petition would not be maintinable. We are therefore, not inclined to entertain the writ petition without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to negotiate with the bank in whatever manner it is possible. The writ petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 R./