Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Neelu @ Shrikant @ Neelesh vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 108 of 2021 Applicant :- Neelu @ Shrikant @ Neelesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vivek Rastogi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the charge-sheet no. 45 of 2019 dated 09.05.2019 in Case No. 634 of 2020 (State Vs. Neelu @ Shrikant @ Neelesh and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 24 of 2019, under Sections 60, 63, 72 of Excise Act and Section 420 IPC, Police Station Bichhwa, District Mainpuri, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate-I, Mainpuri.
At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers made in this application. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seek bail and accept all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon him. The only prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant is for expeditious disposal of his bail application.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the prayer, so far as it relates to seeking quashing of the charge-sheet stands refused.
However, it is directed that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of the settled law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
It is made clear that no application seeking extension of time shall be entertained if this order is not complied with within the aforesaid period.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 12.1.2021 Lbm/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neelu @ Shrikant @ Neelesh vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 January, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Varma
Advocates
  • Sunil Kumar