Seeking to punish the respondent for the alleged disobedience of the decree and judgement dated 15.03.2006 made in O.S.No.306 of 1998 and for a consequential direction to the respondent to surrender the possession of the property in question, the petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition.
S.NAGAMUTHU.J., AND N.AUTHINATHAN.J.,
2. The petitioner alleges that the respondent - President,Thaiyur Village Panchayat, has violated the decree for permanent injunction passed by the learned District Munsif, Chengalpattu in O.S.No.306 of 1998 on 15.03.2006.
3. We have gone through the decree of the learned District Munsif which shows that the decree was passed not against the President of Village Panchayat, but, it was against an individual by name S.Kumaravel, who also incidentally happen to be the President of the Village Panchayat. Since there is no decree against Panchayat represented by President, the respondent who is presently the President of Village Panchayat cannot be in any manner held liable for the alleged violation of decree passed by the learned District Munsif.
4. In view of the above, contempt petition is dismissed.
kmk [S.N.,J.] [N.A.N.,J.] 12..01..2017 Contempt Petition No.2537 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in