Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Neelam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20532 of 2019 Petitioner :- Neelam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalit Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Lalit Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State of U.P.
This writ petition has been filed for issue of mandamus and directing the competent authority to consider the claim and grievance of the petitioner and to decide the representation on merit and avoid the respondents not to mutate the name of purchaser of the land in dispute.
A perusal of the representation of the petitioner indicates that the petitioner, indirectly, wants a declaration that Mewa Lal is a insane person, which cannot be adjudicated by the authorities before whom the representation has been filed.
The petitioner has an alternative remedy to file an appropriate application before the District Judge concerned under the relevant Statutes.
The writ petition is disposed of on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 25.6.2019 Amit Mishra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neelam vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ram Surat Ram Maurya
Advocates
  • Lalit Kumar Misra