Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2009
  6. /
  7. January

Needle Industries Limited vs The Regional Provident Fund ...

Madras High Court|07 January, 2009

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that he is not pressing the Writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the endorsement made in the petition, the Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
vaan To
1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Office of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan, P.B.No.3875, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 641 018.
2. The Secretary to Government, Ministry of Labour, Union of India, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, 14, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Needle Industries Limited vs The Regional Provident Fund ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2009

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.