Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Nazim And Others vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10093 of 2021 Applicant :- Nazim And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Babu Vaish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ankit Saran
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants has filed supplementary affidavit, the same is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants seeking anticipatory bail in case crime no. 0094 of 2021, under Sections 341, 504, 452, 427, 352, 323, 506 IPC, Police Station- Gulaothi, District Bulandshahr.
Obviously, no good ground for granting anticipatory bail is made out, for the reason that claim of the applicants are basically on merits. However, considering the entirety of the case at this stage, it is trite law that in cases where punishment upto 7 years is prescribed then protection of Section 41(1) Cr.P.C. is available to the applicants. The court or the police, as the case may be shall act in consonance with the spirit of the same.
If the applicants have any grievance, they may seek regular bail before the appropriate forum.
With the aforesaid observation, the instant anticipatory bail application is disposed off.
It is made clear that nothing has been observed by this Court on merits.
Order Date :- 29.7.2021 Raj
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nazim And Others vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 July, 2021
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Mishra I
Advocates
  • Shyam Babu Vaish