Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Nazim @ Guddu vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19969 of 2021 Applicant :- Nazim @ Guddu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Nagendra Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Nazim @ Guddu, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.326 of 2016, under Sections -3/5A/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station -Didoli, District -Amroha, during pendency of trial.
3. At the outset, learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection citing criminal history of 17 cases. Also, it is submitted that the FIR was lodged on 22.08.2016 and chargesheet submitted on 14.10.2016. At present, coercive measures have been adopted under Section 82 Cr.P.C.
4. In view of the preliminary objection raised, no interference is warranted.
5. Accordingly, the present application is rejected. However, in the event of regular bail application being filed at the appropriate stage, it is expected that the same may be decided as expeditiously as possible, without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.
Order Date :- 22.12.2021 S.Chaurasia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nazim @ Guddu vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 December, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Singh