Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Nazim Ali vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44293 of 2002 Petitioner :- Nazim Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Upadhyaya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kritika Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post on which he is working.
(b) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner equivalent to the salary of regular employees on the principle of equal pay for equal work.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nazim Ali vs State Of U P & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ramesh Upadhyaya