IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.6175/2017 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN NAZEER MOHAMMED HUSSAIN S/O MOHAMMED AGE : 37 YEARS NO.5/421, DARUL AYMAN HANDEL POST MIJAR PUTTIGE VILLAGE, MANGALURU TALUK D.K.DISTRICT-574225 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI UDAY PRAKASH MULIYA, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT, MS BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND DIRECTOR RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL PARK HUNSUR, MYSURU DISTRICT-570001 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD.25.1.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEX-A ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER None appear for the petitioner.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the tender which has been impugned in this writ petition has been cancelled in view of the fact that only one bidder has submitted the bid against the Notice Inviting Tender and the same was rejected due to non-qualification in technical bid.
3. The attention of this Court is drawn to the statement of objections filed on behalf of the respondents.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission and the statement of objections, nothing survive for adjudication in the writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE nvj