Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that applicant was implicated in three cases on the same day under different sections and Act showing police encounter, which was of no injury case. The applicant was released on bail. However, subsequently, the bail was cancelled on the ground of misuse of bail. He contended that in fact due to accident, applicant could not appear before trial Court, hence there was no deliberate misuse of the liberty of the bail. However, the applicant is in jail since 26.4.2010.
Considering the facts, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, let the applicant namely, Navneet @ Seetu Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime No. 92 of 2000, S.T.No. 33 of 2003, under section 25 Arms Act, P.S. Khandauli, District Agra on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
However, he fails to appear before the trial Court without exemption of presence, trial Court will be free to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 21.6.2010 S.A.A.Rizvi