Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Navin Kumar vs District Magistrate

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 25685 of 2001 Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Respondent :- District Magistrate, Hathras & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gajendra Pratap,P.K. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ, order, rule or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 20.6.2001 and 24.5.2001 passed by the respondent no. 1.
(ii) Issue a writ, order, rule or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to work as Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayt Hasayan in pursuance of the order dated 13th December, 1999 and not to interfere in his peaceful working as Executive officer.“
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 sailesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Navin Kumar vs District Magistrate

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Gajendra Pratap P K Srivastava