Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Naveen Shukla vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 August, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Heard Sri Sheo Prakash Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, as well as learned Government Advocate.
This petition has been filed for quashing the First Information Report in Case Crime no. 322/2018, under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Maholi, District- Sitapur.
Learned Additional Government Advocate has informed that the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy under Section 438 Cr.P.C. wherein the petitioner ought to have moved an application for anticipatory bail before appropriate Court. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner says that he will require a little time to avail the remedy.
Accordingly, ten days' time from today is allowed to the petitioner for approaching the appropriate court and availing the remedy. Till the said period of ten days from today, the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case crime.
With the above observations, the writ petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.8.2019 Rahul/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Naveen Shukla vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 August, 2019
Judges
  • Shabihul Hasnain
  • Narendra Kumar Johari