Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Naval Singh And Another vs Priyanka Niranjan

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 7
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3766 of 2021 Applicant :- Naval Singh And Another Opposite Party :- Priyanka Niranjan, District Magistrate Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Chandra Pandey
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and perused the record.
By means of this contempt application filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 non-compliance of the order dated 8th February, 2021 passed by writ Court in Writ- C No.- 4090 of 2021 is complained of.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that the proceedings were instituted against the sitting Gram Pradhan taking recourse to the provisions under U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 and show cause notice was issued under Section 95(1)(g) of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. It is submitted that no further action has been taken in respect thereof.
On a pointed query being made as to whether Gram Pradhan is still continuing in the office or not, learned counsel for the applicants submits that elections have been held in the year 2021 and new Gram Pradhan has come to be elected.
The question is now, therefore, as to whether still inquiry can be conducted under U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 or not.
Learned counsel for the applicants has relied upon a judgment of Division Bench of this Court dated 19th May, 2011 passed in Writ- C No.- 28404 of 2011 (Smt. Suhaga Devi (Ex-Pradhan) vs. State of U.P. and others) in which vide paragraph 8 it has been held that the inquiry can be conducted in the event of misappropriation of public money by the Pradhan even after he has been relieved from his office after elections held and new incumbent has taken over.
In the considered opinion of the Court, the inquiry cannot be conducted under U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 and inquiry if initiated, it is always open to the authority to hold inquiry taking the recourse of Section 27 of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947.
In such above view of the matter, at this stage, this application is disposed of with a direction to the authority concerned to take an appropriate action in the matter if so desirable and bring the same to its logical end within a period of three months from the date of production of copy of this order in compliance of the order of writ Court.
It is provided that the order available on the official website of the High Court will be taken to be authentic one.
Order Date :- 24.9.2021 Atmesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Naval Singh And Another vs Priyanka Niranjan

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 September, 2021
Judges
  • Ajit Kumar
Advocates
  • Umesh Chandra Pandey