Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Nathu vs B O R

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 13
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6630 of 1981 Petitioner :- Nathu Respondent :- B.O.R.
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Mehrotra,V.K.Barman Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,H.O.K.Srivastava,Janardan Sahai
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
In view of the office reports dated 13.9.2018, 4.10.2018 and 10.10.2018, service of notice issued to petitioner nos. 1 to 6 and respondent nos. 2 to 6 to engage another counsel is deemed sufficient.
However, no one has appeared on behalf of the said parties.
Sri Archit Mehrotra, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.K. Mehrotra, counsel for the proposed party also states that despite repeated letters written to his client, they are not receiving instructions from the client.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018 Satyam
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nathu vs B O R

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2018
Judges
  • Salil Kumar Rai
Advocates
  • S K Mehrotra V K Barman