Nathu Lal vs State Of U P And Others

Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1862 of 2018 Petitioner :- Nathu Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Agrawal

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

Sri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel appeared for the Bank.

From perusal of record, it transpires that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous.

In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

However, in case any cause of action survives, petitioner may move an application for recall of the order.

Order Date :- 26.10.2021 V.S.Singh