Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Nasir vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52708 of 2019 Applicant :- Nasir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Mishra,Vijay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Nasir with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 80 of 2018, under Sections 376-D IPC, and Section 3/4 POCSO Act Police Station GRP Junction Bareilly, District- Bareilly, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is submitted that age of the victim as per medical report is sixteen years. Given margin of two years on higher side she can be considered to be major.The applicant was not named in the First Information Report.The victim named the applicant in her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that before the doctor she has also not named the applicant. She has again named the applicant in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. No sign of rape has been found by the doctor. In the supplementary report there is no recovery of incriminating. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.4.2018, who is not a previous convict. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 Atul kr. sri.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nasir vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Pradeep Kumar Mishra Vijay Singh