Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Nasima Khatun vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41400 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Nasima Khatun Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to describe respondent No.3 as Tehsildar Sadar, District-Muzaffarnagar.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
The petitioner wants that his representation to the Tehsildar be decided within a time-bound period. In the representation, petitioner want that the nuisance arising out of the running of an electric motor in a residential premises be removed.
If that be so, the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 133 Cr.P.C. to get the nuisance removed by moving an application before the District Magistrate or a Sub Divisional Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate empowered in that behalf.
In view of the above, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the authority concerned, which shall be considered in accordance with law most expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 LN Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Nasima Khatun vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Atul Kumar Kushwaha