Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

N.Arumugam vs The Sub-Collector

Madras High Court|15 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.C.Jagdish, learned Special Government Pleader (M.V. & M.M.) takes notice for the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondent to release of tractor along with trailer bearing Registration No.TN 73-B-1724.
3. It is stated that the above vehicle, Tractor along with Trailor was seized by the Tahsildar, Vembakkam, Thiruvannamalai District on 16.02.2017 on the allegation that the said vehicle was indulged in transporting sand in violation of certain provisions under the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. According to the petitioner, there was no such violation and he has also submitted a written representation on 08.03.2017 and so far no orders have been passed. Needless to say that it is for the authority to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders and therefore, this Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the vehicle was seized as early as on 16.02.2017 and the same is kept idle thereby exposing it to sun and rain, which undoubtedly would diminish its value, this Court is of the view that the following order will protect the interest of both parties:
a) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) before the respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order .
b) The petitioner shall appear in person and produce all the relevant documents proving the ownership of the vehicle with trailer and tipper for verification of the authority in proof of such ownership.
(c) On receipt of payment as stated supra and also on being satisfied with the ownership of the vehicle with trailer and tipper, the respondent shall release the same forthwith.
(d) The petitioner shall not use the said vehicle with trailer and tipper for any unlawful purpose and also shall not alienate the same during the pendency of the proceedings.
(e) It is open to the respondent to initiate proceedings in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
vsi with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(f) If no such order is passed within the time stipulated therein, the amount so paid by the petitioner shall be refunded to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
15.03.2017 Speaking/Non Speaking Index : Yes/No vsi To The Sub-Collector, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.
W.P.No.6235 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

N.Arumugam vs The Sub-Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 March, 2017